New technology always bring unknown factors. Over the past year, leading web browsers began implementing a new internet protocol called DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH). DoH is a method for performing Domain Name System (DNS) resolution, using the HTTPS Protocol.
This represents a significant change in how browser vendors envision the future of DNS. Traditionally, DNS lookups have always taken place by the Operating System of the device. By using HTTPS, browser vendors are shifting this responsibility onto themselves.
In order to understand why DoH came about, it’s necessary to understand how DNS currently operates. Since the inception of DNS 35 years ago, DNS queries have been performed in clear-text (unencrypted). Any unencrypted communication is vulnerable to exploitation. When it comes to DNS, these exploitations most commonly come in the form of tracking or spoofing.
Tracking is when your data is collected so that a profile is built of your browsing habits. This data can then be sold to advertisers or other parties. (without your knowledge!)
Spoofing is when DNS requests are forged. Mozilla presents an example where a user is connected to the WiFi at a retail store. The store’s DNS server could manipulate your DNS queries so that attempts to do a price comparison on a competitor’s website will fail or redirect.
The natural question to ask is “Who is the biggest perpetrator?” In many cases, the responsible party is the owner of the DNS server the user has connected to by default. Most people are not aware that when they connect to a new network, a DNS provider is automatically assigned to them. If you are at home or at work, this is usually your Internet Provider. If you are traveling to a coffee shop or airport, then by default you’ll use the DNS provider they give you (unless of course you're using a Roaming Client solution like the one DNSFilter provides). Free WiFi providers are often the largest culprits of DNS tracking.
In response to the problems of tracking and spoofing, browser vendors are pushing forward the adoption of DoH. Early in September 2019, Mozilla announced plans to make DoH available by default for Firefox users in the United States. Shortly afterwards, Google announced similar plans for its upcoming build of Chrome. These decisions have introduced controversy and the implications are commonly misunderstood.
However, Mozilla and Google are going through an experimentation phase before fully switching over to DoH. They appear to both have a willingness to work with major DNS security providers (such as DNSFilter). Mozilla is the closest to full implementation, and has already worked directly with DNSFilter to ensure that Firefox is in full compliance with our service.
The existence of DoH highlights the importance of maintaining control over your DNS data. By employing protective DNS like DNSFilter to secure your DNS, you are preventing DNS tracking and spoofing. Here are a few takeaways as we move into a DoH world:
The biggest question raised by DNS-over-HTTPS is how it will affect companies which have their own DNS security, such as DNSFilter. There are two steps you can take to ensure that DoH does not interfere with your filtering policies:
For more information on DNS encryption, check out our on-demand webinar that pits DoH against DoT.
An Interview with Remote Work Expert Kaleem Clarkson
Companies and their employees are seeing the benefits of moving workforces to a virtual (or work from home) distribution. We sat down with remote work expert, Kaleem Clarkson, for a deeper dive.
Domain Intelligence from Full-Scope Cyber Threat Intelligence: An Introspective
Alex Applegate, Threat Intelligence Researcher at DNSFilter, shares what went into his decision to shift his cybersecurity focus to domain intelligence research.
RSAC 2022: The Rise of DNS-Based Attacks
With RSAC 2022 behind us, we’re reflecting on one of the most important themes at the conference: Rising DNS-based attacks.